Most of you will be familiar with the nursery rhyme:
Star light, star bright,
First star I see tonight,
I wish I may, I wish I might,
Have this wish I wish tonight.
My current wish is a clearer understanding of what is meant by “observation” in various physics paradigms, and how this relates (if at all) to Awareness as the final, ultimate perceiver/observer.
I’ll be returning to this topic in coming weeks. And as a starting-point will offer this passage—excerpted from an interesting essay posted by the NASA Glenn Research Center—that describes three very distinct ways of understanding the experience of seeing a star.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
“Let us ask a simple question: When you look up at night and “see” a star, what is “really” going on? A Newtonian philosopher might answer that you are “really seeing” the star, since, in Newtonian physics, the speed of light is reckoned as being infinite. An Einsteinian philosopher, on the other hand, would answer that you are seeing the star as it was in a past epoch, since light travels with finite velocity and therefore takes time to cross the gulf of space between the star and your eye. To see the star “as it is right now” has no meaning since there exists no means for making such an observation.
A quantum philosopher would answer that you are not seeing the star at all. The star sets up a condition that extends throughout space and time—an electromagnetic field. What you “see” as a star, is actually the result of a quantum interaction between the local field and the retina of your eye. Energy is being absorbed from the field by your eye, and the local field is being modified as a result. You can interpret your observation as pertaining to a distant object if you wish, or concentrate strictly on local field effects.”